The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
The line graph gives information on weekly fish and meat consumption per person in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
In 1979, the most eaten kind of meat was beef and the least one was fish. People in this country ate roughly 225 gm beef per week while such people consumed only 60 gm fish in a week. Beef consumption fluctuated between 1979 and 1984, leveled in nest 5 years and decreased dramatically from 225 gm to 100 gm per week 1989 to 2004. Fish consumption also had been declining from 60 gm to 45 gm in 25 year period.
The other outstanding trends in the consumption of kinds of meat indicated in the graph are chicken and lamb. They had converse directions. In 1979, the weight of consumed chicken by an individual was 140 gm per week which had been increased significantly to 250 gm per week in 2004. By contrast, people in such European country had diminished drastically their lamb consumption from 150 gm to 60 gm per week in 25 year period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work job satisfaction is an important element of individual well being What factors contribute to job satisfaction How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers 56
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the course 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accomodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52272727273 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64565369447 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505681818182 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1586521836 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4444444444 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25825009357 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13815761877 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126739849734 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261222313718 0.15604864568 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136328301991 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.73 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.