there is a good deal of evidence that increasing car use is contributing to global warming and having other undesirable effects on people’s health and well-being.
what can be done to discourage people from using their cars?
Mass car ownership clearly has a number of undesirable consequences for people’s health and fitness as well as for the environment and community life generally. Nevertheless, owning a car is still seen as a desirable option. In fact, the number of cars in the world today is fast approaching one billion. Although this trend may seem inexorable, there is much that can be done to discourage unnecessary car use.
One possible approach is to make cars expensive to own and use, for example, by taxing the at the point of purchase or annually through a road tax. Certain types of car use, for instance, short journeys within already congested cities, can also be discourages through road pricing schemes such as that operating means of transport are available.
Evidence suggests that where public transport options are plentiful, convenient and reliable, people will use them. Inhabitants of cities such as Paris, which have invested heavily in commuter rail networks, are more likely to use public transport than people living in cities where such networks have been allowed to deteriorate.
A less expensive and more environmentally sound option is to create a network of cycle lanes and other facilities for cyclists, such as safe weatherproof shelters for parking bicycles. This has the additional advantage of encouraging people to keep fit whilst allowing them to flexibility of autonomous travel. Cities in the Netherlands which have relatively high rates of cycling, have shown how this can work.
In brief, the trend towards rising car ownership and use need not be inexorable. People can be encourages to use other means of transport. However, rhetoric alone is unlikely to bring about change. Investment in practical alternatives is what is needed above all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-10 | samandarkumar | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-10 | samandarkumar | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | Huong.0911 | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | lili__nhnh | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-19 | KateCl | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and
- In many large cities people waste hours of their time every day because of traffic congestion on the roads What are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 86
- The table shows the percentage of journeys made by different forms of transport in four countries The bar graph shows the results of a survey into car use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 89
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Wr 73
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...be inexorable. People can be encourages to use other means of transport. However, rhet...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, well, as for, for example, for instance, in brief, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2350877193 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89682221535 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621052631579 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1301607012 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352749293852 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114723218014 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088604407046 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187928366859 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795319237846 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.