the pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
The pictures compare the units of electricity produced by five sources in Australia and France from 1980 to 2000.
It is noticeable that the production in total for both countries saw a significant increase over the period shown. The main resource used to produce electricity did not change in Australia but were different ones in France from 1980 to 2000.
In 1980, half of the electricity (50 units) produced by coal in Australia, while natural gas and hydropower generated an equal number of units (20). Oil alone contributed 10 units of electricity and there was no nuclear station. In France, however, coal and natural gas, which were the two most common sources, each had produced 25 units of the total electricity in 1980. Oil, nuclear power and hydropower followed after, with the production of 20, 15 and 5 units respectively.
In the following 20 years, the total electricity production in France (180 units) overtook the amount of electricity produced in Australia (170 units), which was doubled the number of 1980s. in 2000, the production from coal had increased from 50 units to 130 unit that accounted to 3/4 of the total production. In France, all the resources contributed less to the total production, except the nuclear power which had become the dominating source with the production of 126 units.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-07 | Atefeh 1248 | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | Licee | 78 | view |
- the pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 70
- in the future nobody will buy printed newspaper or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- 5 The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the mai 67
- the diagram below shows how raw materials are used to make plastic products
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... which was doubled the number of 1980s. in 2000, the production from coal had incr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04109589041 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78021077328 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529680365297 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6750737152 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339272920135 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157180144415 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977045770115 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256566919174 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796516838521 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.