The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained
higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012.
The bar charts illustrate the total spending on boys and girls schools in Singapore between 2000 and 2012. The pie chart compares the percentage of students in higher education in Singapore who gained degree and diploma in 2000 and 2012.
Overall, the school expenditure of boys and girls steadily raise in the period of 12 years from 2000 to 2012. In addition, a higher proportion of students gained diplomas compared with those who were awarded degrees.
Starting with below 10 million US dollars in 2000, total school spending on boys register an increasing trend through years and got 20 million and 25 million in 2004 and 2008, respectively. At the end, boys expenditure reached a peak of roughly 32 million in 2012. Similar trend can be seen in girls expenditure but lower which began with 6 million in 2000, then gradually rose through years and final reached a high of 20 million in 2012.
There was an increasing proportion of students who gained higher education degrees in Singapore between 2000 and 2012. The percentage rose from 27% in 2000 to 32% in 2012, whereas the proportion of those who graduated with diplomas decreased from 73% in 2000 to 68% in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-18 | ngoctham4344 | 63 | view |
| 2020-07-18 | ngoctham4344 | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-18 | ngoctham4344 | 56 | view |
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people think that young people should follow the traditional values of their society Others think that young people should be free to act as individuals Discuss both these views and give your opinion 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In many countries people are spending more time in the workplace Why is this Is this a negative or positive development 92
- Attending a live performance for example a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 1615.20841683 61% => OK
No of words: 201.0 315.596192385 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89054726368 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56027074012 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 176.041082164 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482587064677 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 506.74238477 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8105986415 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.222222222 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.522386261219 0.244688304435 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.255369943076 0.084324248473 303% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175808317404 0.0667982634062 263% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.383663421 0.151304729494 254% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179407146737 0.056905535591 315% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 50.2224549098 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 78.4519038076 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.