Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources ( Internet or television )
To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
Nowadays, there are many tools help students learn new things. However, it is believed that learning with teachers is a better way than any other sources such as Internet or television. I partly agree with this statement.
There are a variety of reasons that students should learn with their teachers. Firstly, teachers are experienced and they are usually willing to pass on to their students. They gain experiences during the period they teach, therefore, they know what is the best and most suitable way for their students to access to new knowledge. For example, there are many ways to solve a math exercise when a student searching for it on the Internet. However, the teacher always know and show him the best way to solve this exercise. Secondly, teachers are more enthusiastic to teach their students than other sources. They can explain a exercise many times for their students inorder to be more clearly. No tools can do this except for teachers.
On the other hand, learning with teachers is not sufficient enough for students to learn new things.Teachers may not provide students with the most exact and fastest sources of information. For example, without the help of teacher, a Vietnamese studentcan learn about America through the information on the Internet. Moreover, it sometimes takes students much time and money to learn with teachers. Instead, students can study at home to save time and money. A student who have little time to reseach on the experiment chemistry, for instance, can search for the videos and lessons online about this sector so as to save time doing experiments with teacher.
In conclusion, I think that each way of learning has its own positive and negative aspect. Students should consider carefully what is the most suitable way to study effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-25 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-25 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-27 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-26 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-25 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 67
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Technology is becoming more and more prevalent in the world today Given time technology will completely replace the teachers in the classroom To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 624, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ts than other sources. They can explain a exercise many times for their students ...
^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Teachers
...enough for students to learn new things.Teachers may not provide students with the most ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... chemistry, for instance, can search for the videos and lessons online about this...
^^
Line 5, column 609, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...os and lessons online about this sector so as to save time doing experiments with teache...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...most suitable way to study effectively.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as to, except for, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08724832215 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65078582038 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513422818792 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1514299364 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2222222222 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5555555556 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72222222222 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344627462522 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120830504912 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814666200789 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218158783369 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836709882565 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.