animals extinction
Some controversy has been generated about what caused the mass extinction that happened at the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago. The reading states that there are three possible explanations for this event. However, the author argues that none of these points are sound right.
The first point of dispute is if fluctuation of the see lever led to the mass extiction. The lecturer explains that sea animals did not affect by the change of sea levels if they happen gradually. She adds that basically the change that happened at the end of Triassic period occured over a long time, actually about millions of years. Therefore, it is impossible that changing of the sea levels could have caused animals to disappear. By contrast, the writer is simply condent to accept the explanation of sea level change.
The second controversial issue is about if sulfur dioxied led to change in the climate. According to the professor, it is true that there were many volcanic activities at the end of the Triassic period. Thus, the sulfur dioxide ultimately realsed on the atmosphere from active volconoes. However, these molecules did not stay long enough in the atomosphere to caused the cooling effect. In addition, the sulfur dioxed molecules bind with water molecules and eventually fall as rain. In spite that surprisingly the writer does not take the idea of returing of the sulfur dioxed to the Earth as rain in his account.
The final point of depate is the question of the asteroid that hit the Earth could have caused the animals' extinction. The speaker asserts that the writer's opnion that the materials that thrown up due to the asteriod strike is totally unconvincing. The carter that had been found on was dated to 12 million years before the extinction that is a really long time to connected to the species extinction. Despite that possible rationale, the writer ignores all these potential explanations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-23 | Jasmine123 | 75 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...turer explains that sea animals did not affect by the change of sea levels if they happen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...hat hit the Earth could have caused the animals extinction. The speaker asserts that th...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 250, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...steriod strike is totally unconvincing. The carter that had been found on was dated...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, really, second, so, therefore, thus, in addition, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 13.8261648746 7% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 323.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98761609907 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60803527585 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541795665635 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8909559829 48.9658058833 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.5 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9444444444 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130324025493 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031541240402 0.076458572812 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513178762511 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074999829272 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496855331539 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.