Attending a live performance (for example, a play, concert, or sporting event) is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, it has been stated that participating in a live performance is more gratifying than watching the broadcasted version on television. I utterly agree with this point of view.
There are two compelling reasons for people to attend a live show in lieu of watching it on television. First, the atmosphere in the auditorium can evoke a intriguing and exciting feeling for attendees, which can not be reached when they watch shows through screen. For example, most people go to stadium not only to watch football players and their performances but also to being a part of cheering crowd to warm the environment. Another reason is by attending a live music or competitive show, attendees can watch whole programs and know exactly what happens in these shows. This means that in some music concert, organizers want to do something special for fans directly joining so they cut some wonderful performances which only appear in this live show. As a result, spectators can not enjoy these unique parts of the show.
Despite some aforementioned proofs, some protesters also claim that by watching the performance on television at home helping people save many sources such as time and money. For example, if people want to take part in live shows themselves, they need to spend time travelling to destination where the shows are held and spend money for costly entrance tickets. This suggestion seems reasonable, however, I totally disagree because nowadays the organizers always understand these problems so they always celebrate events in many different regions, provinces or even countries to facilitate for people to attend and the price of events now are all affordable.
In conclusion, I strongly believe taking part in live shows gives people more special memories and feelings than watching on television.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-10 | dinhngocquynh2003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | Pham Van Nhan | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | trinhthanh1 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | trinhthanh1 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | trinhthanh1 | 67 | view |
- The bar chart shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people think the news has no connection to people s lives so then it is a waste of time to read the news in the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that young people should follow the traditional values of their society Others think that young people should be free to act as individuals Discuss both these views and give your opinion 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... atmosphere in the auditorium can evoke a intriguing and exciting feeling for att...
^
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...lems so they always celebrate events in many different regions, provinces or even countries to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19727891156 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81239661396 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6689188778 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254982894548 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921801340765 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409426374511 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150882725686 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215018814526 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.