Nowadays, families are not as close as in the past and a lot of people have become used to this.
Explain the reasons for this and discuss any possible effects it may have on society.
The concept of family has gradually lost its value, and as a result, there is a growing distance between relatives.This essay will discuss the causes that have determined this situation, as well as its social consequences.
Technological innovation and transport expansion are the main reasons for the lack of closeness between families. One hundred years ago, communication between people that lived far away was much more complicated due to the slow ways of transport and the complexity of the first telephones. Therefore, human contact rely on the people who lived with each other. In other words, families. Nowadays, thus to social media and new ways of transport, such as the bus or the subway, its quite simple to maintain friendships with people that live in other towns.
One of the consequences consist of a change of mentality. In the previous times, family had an important role in each person's identity. Someone's background and family history determined who they were and how they would be treated by society. These days, especially in developed countries, what the individual has made of himself is gaining much more importance. In addition, the lost of family relationships will probably generalise the feeling of solitude among elders. If old people are not visited or taken care of by their children o grandchildren, they could end up feeling quite lonely.
To conclude, the improvement of the mediums to socialise has caused a growth apart between families, which can lead to loneliness in elders, due to their dependance on their relatives, and a new conception of the individual.
- Nowadays families are not as close as in the past and a lot of people have become used to this Explain the reasons for this and discuss any possible effects it may have on society 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features an 78
- Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram below shows the production of electricity using a system called Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion OTEC Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 11
- Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...is a growing distance between relatives.This essay will discuss the causes that have...
^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s with people that live in other towns. One of the consequences consist of a cha...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...s, family had an important role in each persons identity. Someones background and famil...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18461538462 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95414661933 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623076923077 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.293889172 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.692307692 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114590984345 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335615127472 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039651174768 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0629392325349 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497788940749 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.