Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television. However, television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less well‐educated today. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Since technology are improved, computers and TV have been more popular especially for children. This issue has led teenagers to spend more time watching TV instead of reading books which I believe cannot have the same quality of time where people have read books as a learning tool. Although this issue has several causes, this essay is going to talk about few of them.
The first significant reason why I totally agree with that statement is the fact that TV has been created to entertain people during their free time. These diverse programs have been range from sports, news ,etc., which have given some information to individuals about various subjects. But despite giving those, it has not been a serious source for learning one specific subject. For example, people might have seen different documentaries about nature or wildlife but it has not showed lots of details about that topic. Therefore , maybe people have seen some programs but it does not mean that they have learned something which have gained knowledge for them. Consequently, if someone wants to have more science facts, they must think of taking a course in their interested field instead of watching TV.
Additionally, thorough all these years in TV schedules more and more fun and entertainment programs have been created. And that is because of the programmer’s tendency to make more money and also be well-known in population. Under those circumstance, producers and directors have been fonder of making those programs because they have had more followers among their viewers. As a result, there have been less learning ones to show to people. This issue has propelled to have more people with shallow thoughts and less educated because they have spent their free time just watching TV schedule such as movies and series which they could not obtain much knowledge from them.
In conclusion, in my opinion watching TV cannot be as effective as books to gain scientific subjects. This is because of several reasons including having less learning programs and also if there are, they cannot give a good deal of determined information which could be even wrong.
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sport Centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 67
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others say that this would have little effect on public health and the other measures are required Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...grams have been range from sports, news and etc. which have given some information to in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...showed lots of details about that topic.Therefore, maybe people have seen some programs b...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08498583569 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58962562375 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535410764873 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3020604617 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.1875 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152703258618 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578874018143 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535477518745 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117344619004 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482186361788 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.