Experience is more effective and useful than books and formal education. To what extent do you agree with this opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of "experience is more effective and useful than books and formal education" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that formal education might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that experiences alongside books can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, the effectiveness of experiences can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that being an expert and useful experiences are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of formal education. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both skilled workers and having experiences distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of education science, without the slightest doubt, relying solely on books and formal education might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the lack of experimental knowledge. Moreover, fundamental aspects of traditional learning methods can relate to the reality that the demerits of formal education can pertain to the lack of field training. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of books were correlated positively with promoting innovation, the local authorities would ultimately address the talent of students. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of the combination of experiences and formal education.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt vigorously to support the idea that the merits of experiences than books and formal education far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-28 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2018-11-27 | Tracyabc | 77 | view |
- The chart bellow shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits if five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people see prisons as the place where criminals should be punished while some people think their primary function should be to teach them how to lead better lives What is your opinion about the main function of time spent in prison punishment or reha 80
- The advanced medical technology will expand human s life Do you think it is a blessing or a curse 89
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience such as international travel and volunteering Support with examples or cases 88
- In countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85714285714 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32218885308 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.0502015662 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.090909091 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312037800603 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110418456721 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652056147678 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181656787421 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424045571835 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.