Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, especially since social media and TVs have been improved, advertising has been playing an important role for selling goods. This has led some people to believe, buyers have just concentrated on adds not their needs. Although this statement could be true, this essay is going to talk about writer’s opinion which could be called as an approximate agreement.
First of all, the role of advertising could not be denied not only by producers who have wanted to sell their goods with satisfying profit, but also for people who have not liked wasting their money for invaluable things. These days, where actually people have been watching TVs and also websites like YouTube, producers have had to release expanded advertisement which has made their goods public. Moreover, individuals especially children, who could be encouraged easily, have been stimulated to buy the goods. The More exciting ads to be produced, the more consumer will be buyers. And the fact which people’s mind could be deviated from their actual needs by seeing some interesting ads could not be neglected.
Additionally, producers and financial sponsors of the goods which have been advertised, definitely have not wanted to take a critical risk which have been thought as failure work. So the reason why I can be disagree with the mentioned opinion is the fact which society’s needs have been watched by those people. As a result, they would not produce something which would not have a successful future. Consequently, the famous goods which have had multiple ads have been people’s requests in a particular time which could be not only in the past, but also in the future. For example, watching some advertising about smart phones which have so many modern virtues, could be inane for the past, but in these days, they are human’s desires.
In conclusion, although advertisements have been an essential factor to sell goods, they are not the only element. Based on writer’s view which do not totally concur with, advertising could change people’s idea about buying things but they have been produced based on what society wants.
- the graphs below show the types of music purchased in Britain according to sex and age 67
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 61
- living in cities or countryside is one of the main decision for humans to make discuss advantages and disadvantages for both of them and give your own opinion 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 84
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15561959654 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62872549778 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512968299712 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9293821084 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.266666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126155284026 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557902587042 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387749371419 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930272022821 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480758640677 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.