Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The large amount of money should be spent by governments in some places on railway networks. I completely disagree with this idea, and instead the funds should be allocated for highways development.
There are several reasons why railway systems should not be invested. Firstly, it is extremely expensive to train staffs for building a new railway network, and equipment and facilities also come at a huge cost. Secondly, it is a waste of time to build a whole new rail line due to limited areas, you need to choose a place carefully. Finally, using a public railways could brings several limitations when you are in hurry. When you wake up at 8 A.M and you had meeting at 8.30 A.M, it could be better to use your private vehicles such as cars or motorbikes.
I believe that the money for investment in rail lines should go to highways instead. It is much cheaper to train workers for constructing roads rather than staffs who works for railway network projects. Also, roads are much more popular and friendly to all kinds of transportation. For example, roads are allocated by both private and public vehicles such as cars, buses, bikes, etc but we can not do similar things on rail lines. Moreover, constructing a road is very flexible at any place with simple techniques and facilities.
In conclusion, my view is that governments should spend money on roads due to easily accessibility, and it is not efficient to pay money on railway system that is limited to train as only vehicles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd instead the funds should be allocated for highways development. There are sev...
^^
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'railway'?
Suggestion: railway
...lace carefully. Finally, using a public railways could brings several limitations when y...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 374, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
... Finally, using a public railways could brings several limitations when you are in hur...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 424, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eral limitations when you are in hurry. When you wake up at 8 A.M and you had meetin...
^^^^
Line 2, column 448, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: M
...u are in hurry. When you wake up at 8 A.M and you had meeting at 8.30 A.M, it cou...
^
Line 2, column 480, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: M
... at 8 A.M and you had meeting at 8.30 A.M, it could be better to use your private...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79069767442 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73017929331 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596899224806 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9037970679 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0769230769 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288745951888 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953595216394 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576201291442 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181175199924 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514167249713 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.