The table shows the percentage of people with mobile phones who use various features on their phone. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given picture illustrates the amount of individuals with mini computer who gain access to varieties of features in 3 different period:2006, 2008 and 2010 respectively. Overall, it is evident that making phone calls had the highest percentage, while search the internet and record video had no figure in a particular year.
To begin, in 2006 search the internet and record video account for zero percent, while playing of music, playing of games and taking photos accounted for 12%,17% and 66% respectively. Furthermore, sending text messages generated 67% and on the other hand making of calls peaked the values 100%.
Consequently, in 2008 record video and search the internet saw an increase and generated 9% and 14% respectively. Playing of music 18%, playing of games 42% and also taking of photos accounted for 75%. Hence, sending of text messages was 89% while making of phone calls maintained it's value.
In 2010, record video had increased tremendously to 35%, while search the internet almost doubled it's previous value. Playing of music, playing of games, and taking of photos were 26%, 41%, and 76 % respectively. Sending of text messages was 79%, meanwhile making of calls saw a reduction by 1%
- The chart shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Ambition is a negative attribute of the person s character Do you agree or disagree 91
- The line graph gives information about the number of iranian greek and turkish students who enroll at sheffielded university between 2005 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- Many people say that cooking and eating at home is better for the individual and the family than eating out in restaurants or canteens Do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15656565657 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75007087654 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7326935322 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.1 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0712925420287 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317171404563 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377368014014 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0518245029013 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451634145314 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.