When you look for a job, some people think salary is more important while others think work condition is more important. Which one do you agree with?
Recently, the phenomenon of "when you look for a job, some people think the salary is more important while others think the work condition is more important" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the preposition that the work condition might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that salary can be plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the economics standpoint, when looking for a job, the importance of salary can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that more income and improving the quality of life are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of salary ranges on the people's welfare. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both promoting life conditions and eliminating poverty distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, the importance of work condition might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of job satisfaction. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the poor job condition can relate to the reality that the demerits of the lack of motivations can pertain to the employee's self-esteem. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of work places were correlated positively with the high salary, the local authorities would ultimately address well-being of workers. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of workers' mental disorders.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of the importance of salary far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-08 | sattar_iust | 77 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 to 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media for communicating information State which consider to be the most effective Comics Books radio television film theater 84
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- There are more negative impacts than benefits of people using mobile devices Do you agree 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60273972603 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20417664662 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616438356164 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.0283060186 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.727272727 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396213705721 0.242375264174 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116166389693 0.0925447433944 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15869112317 0.071462118173 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2024509693 0.151781067708 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136449083394 0.0609392437508 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.