The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The bar chart and table give information about a country’s export earnings from five groups of products in 2015 and 2016.
It is noticeable that export revenues in all but one of the five product categories increased over the period shown. While petroleum products were the highest earning exports in both years, the textile industry saw the most significant growth in earnings.
Export earnings from petroleum products rose from around $61 billion in 2015 to $63 billion in 2016, which was an increase of 3%. Income from engineered goods reached a similar level. The country’s export earnings from these goods went up by 8.5% to approximately $62 billion in 2016.
From 2015 to 2016, there was a 15.24% increase in export revenue from textiles, with earnings rising from roughly $25 billion to over $30 billion. By contrast, there was almost no change in the amount of money earned from agricultural products, which remained at just over $30 billion. Finally, the only decline in income occurred in the gems and jewellery product group, where export earnings fell by around 5% to approximately $40 billion in 2016.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that we have too many choices these days To what extent to you agree or disagree To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in Someland Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Living in a foreign country cannot signify mean that people will have serious social or practical problems with the native language which is demonstrated with the hundreds and thousands of people who decided to live far from their hometown For this reason 56
- Overall neither owned nor rented accommodation kept the same percentage of households during that period of time except in 1971 which it was equal 50 each one Besides neither none of them represented more than 80 of households from 1918 to 2011 In terms o 73
- People are using a lot of online language translation apps Do the benefits of this outweigh the disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02702702703 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67191108358 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572972972973 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1780401105 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219317392726 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110456920697 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754094039633 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164194683755 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556904042484 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.