Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether we can learn much more from people whose views we share than those whose views contradict our own. Indisputably, disagreement can cause stress and hinder learning, however, contradicting views provide different views which can help us better at learning. Thus, i generally disagree with the assertion that we can learn more from people whose views we share and would argue that we can learn more from people whose views are contradicting our own.
First of all, contradicting views help us to have a look at different perspective of the situation. To illustrate, let us look look at the example of government implementing a step to invest on infrastructure rather than on arts. This step taken by the government can be looked in many different ways, one may argue that the step is economically benevolent, but others may contend that the step is deleterious for the culture or society. consequently, contradicting views help us understand the situation better.
Furthermore, the contradicting views help us to find flaws or improvement in the decision taken. For example, if the government is asked to take a step, with the help of contradicting views, government would be able to refute the contradiction by improving the strategy or by correcting the flaw in the strategy.
Finally, one may argue that disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning, but discussions do not have to be stressful, it can be in a friendly manner. For example, class discussions helps you to find many contradicting views and in a friendly manner. Accepting other persons view is an important skill in life.
in conclusion, as long as healthy discussion takes place, it always help us to learn more from people whose views contradict our own than from people whose views we share .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-02 | kristen_vo | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | RIYA MODI | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Mateo Chen | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | okazaki11 | 62 | view |
- Leaders who are in significant positions of power should be democratically elected not appointed 75
- Technology and the human activity that goes with it inevitably leads to greater pollution and environmental damage 94
- In history there are many cases of mysterious occurrences cultures and habitats and it is true that the great mystery of the disappearance of the Easter Islanders no longer holds a place among them However the notion that invaders created the decline is s 85
- The popular 5 day workweek has long been a staple in U S business With employees working 8 hours a day for a total of 40 hours a week it has been seen as a model of efficiency However some companies and government agencies have begun converting to a 10 ho 70
- Some people believe that university students should be required to attend classes Others believe that going to classes should be optional for students Which point of view do you agree with Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 122, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: look
...of the situation. To illustrate, let us look look at the example of government implementi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 281, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...aken by the government can be looked in many different ways, one may argue that the step is ec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 438, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...deleterious for the culture or society. consequently, contradicting views help us understand...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help us find' instead.
Suggestion: help us find
.... Furthermore, the contradicting views help us to find flaws or improvement in the decision ta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a friendly manner" with adverb for "friendly"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... do not have to be stressful, it can be in a friendly manner. For example, class discussions helps y...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 235, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a friendly manner" with adverb for "friendly"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ou to find many contradicting views and in a friendly manner. Accepting other persons view is an imp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ns view is an important skill in life. in conclusion, as long as healthy discussi...
^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...althy discussion takes place, it always help us to learn more from people whose view...
^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...wn than from people whose views we share .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 300.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07666666667 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06825335516 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476666666667 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5598514371 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.153846154 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 5.21951772744 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.54152809219 0.243740707755 222% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205885979288 0.0831039109588 248% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.22857586011 0.0758088955206 302% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31405682557 0.150359130593 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.269723489766 0.0667264976115 404% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 100.480337079 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.