Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to schoolwork. Which of the two approaches do you prefer?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Many people don't have adequate time to spend with their children. Some parents let their children playing video games or sports. In contrast, others prefer to accompany their children when they do homework. I believe that it would be beneficial to both parents and kids by doing things together.
Firstly, parents and children would establish their closeness by spending time with them for homework. Suppose they are involved in doing a particular task. In that case, they will experience solving a problem and feel a sense of achievement together. Moreover, they tend to have common topics to discuss, so they'll get closer and closer. Hence, it is advantageous for parents and kids to do homework.
Secondly, parents could identify children's talent by inspecting children's responses to the wide variety of studying material, like math, physics, history, and so forth. There is nothing better than this. Parents would be capable of understanding their children's tendencies. To be more specific, if a kid has excellent speed solving a math problem, he or she could have talent in math. Thus, the observation would be helpful for the future academic plan.
On the contrary, playing video games without parents' monitoring could cause improper behavior. It could be detrimental to their mental development. Distinctly, they are adolescents. There are plenty of games with age limit, and only adults are allowed to play the games due to the violent content. For instance, suppose a kid plays a video game in which pretending a villain killing other players. In that case, it would be harmful to his or her mental health. The reason for this is that he or she could be easily affected by the game and imitate the killing demeanor without knowing its severity. Although some video games are entertaining, some are improper for children to play.
In conclusion, it would be best for children and parents to spend time doing things about schoolwork for relationship enhancement and considerable opportunities for parents to observe kids' genius.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | wyc | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | wyc | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-25 | sonyeoso | 73 | view |
- University education should include an internship 76
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 83
- In an effort to bring new jobs to Dillton and stimulate the city s flagging economy Dillton s city council voted last year to lower the city s corporate tax rate by 15 percent at the same time the city began offering generous relocation grants to any comp 59
- Playing and WinningDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing a game is fun only when you win.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing During the past year Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant where the work shifts are one hour shorter than our 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
Many people dont have adequate time to spend with their ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 309, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they'll
...nd to have common topics to discuss, so theyll get closer and closer. Hence, it is adv...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 331.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16314199396 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74363159931 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534743202417 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4409300612 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.3043478261 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3913043478 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30434782609 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294704052071 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867824921795 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815382856795 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192587936298 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120425563544 0.0645574589148 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.