To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether to understand the important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. Indisputably, major cities do provide many insights into the characteristics of a society. Nevertheless, one must study the smaller cities to gain a complete understanding of a society. As a result, I generally disagree with the opinion that one must study the major cities to understand the important characteristics of a society and I would argue that just studying the major cities of a society will not help to understand the important characteristics of a society.
First of all, the development across the major cities of the world looks similar as a result of the intermingling of various societies in which people are travelling far and wide in search of better opportunities and lifestyle, making the society an urban place and not an indigenous living in the city. I would like to point out that, to discover the unique history, religion, culture, tradition and the heritages of a society, smaller communities are more likely to keep the traditions through generations. To illustrate, Lagos is a major city in which many people are coming in from different background and origins. It would be a little harder to have a certain characteristics perceiving by a society. John Wooden said "it is the little details that are vital. Little things make big things happen".
Furthermore, rather focusing a study on a major city to understand the characteristics developed from a society, villages would be more important sample. This would be more efficient as it has developed long-lasting characteristics from their ancestors and it would really help to understand the important characteristics of a society.
In summary, to get a deeper understanding of the characteristics of a society, one must study the smaller communities and not studying the major cities of a society to understand the important characteristics.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-23 | Oladelejnrr | 66 | view |
2023-10-22 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
2023-10-22 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
2023-10-22 | Oladelejnrr | 33 | view |
2023-10-11 | Mallika Asthana | 50 | view |
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 62
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 615, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...important characteristics of a society. First of all, the development across the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 816, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le things make big things happen'. Furthermore, rather focusing a study on ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, really, so, in summary, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 316.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29430379747 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44268165273 2.79657885939 123% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446202531646 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 536.4 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.4233692981 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.692307692 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.549940598658 0.243740707755 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.220526564553 0.0831039109588 265% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.201418422608 0.0758088955206 266% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.40148847125 0.150359130593 267% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.218917266408 0.0667264976115 328% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.