Reading paper materials is better than watching electronic devices to gain information.
The modes of gaining knowledge and information have evolved considerably with changing times. While few decades ago, one had to solely rely on various printed materials like books, articles, newspapers and so on, today the electronic devices and the internet have taken over the same. Due to the convenience of their usage and the speed, I am of the opinion that reading paper materials is not as good as watching electronic devices.
Firstly, the gaining information via electronic devices are much easier to compared to gaining it the printed materials. For instance, in order research about a topic for his presentation using printed materials a student may have to go to the library to borrow books or to a book store to buy them. This may not always be feasible especially if he is sick or if the weather conditions are bad. As opposed to that he can do the same work on this laptop or his smartphone sitting at home without having to worry about stepping out of his house.
Secondly obtaining information is much faster via electronic devices that reading material. For example, when the student goes to the library for his research work using printed materials, he will have to spend hours searching for the books and journals appropriate for his research. This will consume a large share of his time and may leave him with very little time for actually working on his presentation. As opposed to this, using his laptop and the internet, he can do the same amount of research within a few minutes time. Thus electronic devices are always a good time saving alternative to reading material.
Finally, the information on the electronic devices constantly keeps getting updated which is not the case with reading materials. For example, if a new vaccine is invented, it will be immediately accessible via internet on the smartphones and computers whereas it may take months for a book to be written or an article to be published that encompasses this new piece of information.
Therefore in conclusion due to them being much more convenient to use, causing lesser time wastage and constantly getting updated with fresh facts and information, electronic devices are better means of gaining information than the printed reading materials.
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim a 50
- CLAIM Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills REASON These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful 59
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 68
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men an 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... of research within a few minutes time. Thus electronic devices are always a good ti...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...asses this new piece of information. Therefore in conclusion due to them being much mo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 55.5748502994 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 2260.96107784 83% => OK
No of words: 375.0 441.139720559 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.008 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77731252993 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 204.123752495 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501333333333 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 705.55239521 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5273969311 57.8364921388 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.2 119.503703932 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.324526521 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 5.70786347227 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287295204792 0.218282227539 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114207276712 0.0743258471296 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113461299712 0.0701772020484 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177265801167 0.128457276422 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868954191211 0.0628817314937 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 98.500998004 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.