The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Write at least 150 words.

The bar graph provides information about the amount of export earnings from 5 different categories in a nation over one year period, between 2015 and 2016, also, the table gives data on the percentage of value change in each export category in the same nation during the same period.

Overall, it can be seen that the amount of export earnings from petroleum products was the highest in two separate years, whereas export earnings from textiles was the lowest. In addition, according to the table, the amount of exports earnings value in all categories between 2015 and 2016 showed an upward trend, except for gems and jewellery.

Looking to the graph in more detail, it is evident that the amount of export earnings from petroleum products stood at just over 60 billion $ (b$) in 2015, followed by engineered goods at about 58 b$. The former increased to around 62 b$ in 2016 and the latter rose significantly to 61 b$. Export earnings from gems and jewellery stood at around 44 b$ in 2015. By 2016, this figure had decreased to 41 b$. Export earnings from agricultural products and textiles increased from just over 30 b$ and around 26 b$ to about 32 b$ and approximately 31 b$ from 2015 to 2016, respectively.

Turning to the table, it is clear that the percentage of value change in textiles category was the highest, at 15.24%. Gems and jewellery is the only category which showed a downward trend, at 5.18%. The percentage of value change in agricultural products was the lowest, at 0.81%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-29 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 84 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 80 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 73 view
2023-12-09 Tosyne 78 view
Essays by user alpgiray :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, well, whereas, except for, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1247.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81467181467 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60671356718 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467181467181 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.1607240097 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.363636364 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314049667162 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128396057113 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835510287324 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211413612169 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734018140587 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.