At work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity -for example, you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer to work alone or with others?
In today's modern and sophisticated world, people meet different obstacles in their lives. In this connection, there are several avenues to help a person recommends creative solutions for difficulties. Although contested by many that the matter of working alone on subjects to suggest new ideas for a specific problem is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that working in a group can be a plus for proposing creative ideas related to challenges, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
Firstly, working with co-workers reduces one's mental pressure, which is helpful to encounter problems whose solutions are innovative. To be more specific, when a person works in a group, they have fewer responsibilities, which is an ideal situation to concentrate on innovative ideas. According to my own experience, when my manager asked me to complete the specific task which was different from others and needs innovation, I felt a tremendous amount of stress as I was the only person who was responsible for the success of the project. Therefore, my hesitated feelings did not allow me to either present my ideas or focus on the subject significantly. Because there was not anybody to check my notion, so I felt afraid whether it was right or not.
Secondly, when employers collaborate with their colleagues to deal with new tasks, they can gain a considerable amount of information to present particular innovations. To elucidate, each person has the knowledge which is different from others' information, so they have opportunities to intercourse their data. Thus, they can combine information and enhance their ideas by explaining weak points as well as positive sides of them. For example, when I was a university student, my professor handed in the assignment which should be done with the aid of all pupils. All students participate in discussions to find an innovative solution, thereby being familiar with a wealth of ideas. As a result, students chose the best ones and continued argumentation unless all of them became agree on one opinion. Conspicuously, the accepted idea was impressive since many students spent time analyzing its advantages and disadvantages.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that people can solve unfamiliar problems when they are in a group. Not only does group working reduce one mental tension, but it also broadens horizons to solve a challenge.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People would meet many problems in their daily life and they would solve them by themselves or from the help of their families help from the government is not necessary 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is easier to maintain good health today than in the past 88
- Some people think that it is an important part of a child s education to go on field trips for example museums other people think a child s time is better spent learning in a classroom at school What is your opinion 76
- Are government doing well in educating people to pay attention to the importance of the food nutrition and healthy eating 86
- High school teachers teachers of students ages 14 18 spend most of class time lecturing speaking while the students listen and take notes Other high school teachers spend most of class time on discussion and projects that students are highly involved in a 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...broadens horizons to solve a challenge.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as for, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2144.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22926829268 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08038255618 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565853658537 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0101911552 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.111111111 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103597591108 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032768697641 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327034737953 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0679015844209 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378925328647 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.