The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph represents the consumption of fast food by Australian teenagers in the three different categories from 1975 to 2000.
Overall, it is clear that there was an upward trend in the consumption of hamburgers and pizza whereas the figure of fish and chips indicated a downward trend.
To begin with, fish and chips were the most popular fast food in Australia, being consumed approximately 100 times per year. The consumption of fish and chips was far higher than that of pizza and hamburgers which started at lower level with about 9 and 15 times, respectively. After a brief decline i...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-09 | Sanaullah97 | 78 | view |
- A rise in the standard of living in a country often only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas. What problems might this different cause? How might these problems be reduced. 80
- Studying the English language in an English speaking country is the best but not the only way to learn language. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- Many parents these days work in other countries taking their families with them Do you think advantages of the development outweigh its disadvantages 77
- In many countries young people leave rural areas to study and work in cities What do you think are reasons for this Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 86
- Economic progress is one way to measure a country’s success. What other factors do you think should be concerned when measuring the success of a country? In these factors, which one is the most important? 83
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 185 200
No. of Characters: 860 1000
No. of Different Words: 106 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.688 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.649 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.691 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 47 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 36 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 29 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.125 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.855 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.466 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.727 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.106 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4