The best way for Governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and 7 days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people argue that providing citizen with fee-free public transport is the most efficient way for governments to deal with traffic jams. While I agree that this solution may bring certain advantages, I am convinced that it is likely to have many impacts on society.
On the one hand, the option to supply non-fee public vehicle may exert certain disadvantages. To begin with, it is not necessary to provide free public transport in 24 hours per day and 7 days a week due to the fact that traffic congestion just happens only in rush hours such as early in the morning and late in the afternoon. The second demerit which should not be ignored is that providing public transport without any charge is not a smart solution for the economic development. I think Government should spend that investment on developing infrastructure construction like widening roads. Finally, with my experience at commuting by bus, I find this mean of transport time-consuming and inconvenient because I have to depend on its schedule. So even buses are provided freely, I will choose to ride my motorbike.
On the other hand, if this policy is implemented, various merits will be generated to society. Firstly, it encourages more people to partake in these means of transport, which may help to decrease the number of vehicles on the road. The second merit which should be highlighted is that the less vehicles are used, the less polluted the environment is. This solution will contribute much to our effort to reduce the carbon dioxide released to the air environment.
In conclusion, providing free public transport have both advantages and disadvantages. However, in my opinion, this is not a useful way to solve traffic jams because demerits seem outweigh merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-06 | Vuthungan | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-31 | tranguyen1234 | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-27 | Tranguyen2401 | 56 | view |
| 2020-08-27 | Tranguyen2401 | 56 | view |
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both view and give your opinion 89
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies 80
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and Government should encourage some businesses to move from cities to rural areas Does advantage outweigh the disadvantage 89
- in some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles while in other cities riding bikes are replacing cars Why is this the case Which development do you think is better 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
...it encourages more people to partake in these means of transport, which may help to decreas...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun vehicles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...which should be highlighted is that the less vehicles are used, the less polluted th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05498281787 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88257369627 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587628865979 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6187540356 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.071428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266732106044 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780359360312 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999986723069 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155147726512 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921362719688 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.