The chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education.
The following bar chart explains for the reader aspects of a percentual proportion between boys and girls in different steps of education life. Using the research and data exposed is possible to conclude that developed nations were increasing your numbers in all stages and had achieved the target tertiary education. In contrast, developing countries have proved important regression in your rates and stay so far to obtain a great result.
In the developed nations is possible to observe a positive trend in all levels of education. But is relevant to highlight the tertiary, this group performs over the target (numbers of girls per 100 boys) since 1990 when they show 105 girls and increased it to 112 eight years after.
On the other hand the developing countries exposed slight growth in all categories of education, but they have a long distance to run until the target. For instance, the major gap went showed by tertiary education, they expand your numbers to 75 girls per 100 boys when the targe is 100.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | Lamdao1506 | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | Lamdao1506 | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | Lamdao1506 | view | |
| 2023-02-22 | Mabel Nguyenn | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | bapcai | 67 | view |
- The graphs below show the growth in wages within the G7 Nations between 2000 2007 and 2008 2012 73
- Some people believe that capital punishment should not be used Others however argue that it should be allowed for the most serious crimes Discuss both views and give your opinion 70
- Hosting sporting events such as the Olympics and the World Cup can bring benefits to the host countries How far do you agree with this statement Use your own examples to support 60
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent per week on fast food Britain The chart shows the trends in consumption of fast food 73
- The bar chart below shows US seafood imports for 1986 1996 and2016 and the forecast for 2026 The pie chart shows thegeographical structure of these imports in 2016 49
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, for instance, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95321637427 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57121142857 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614035087719 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2902435522 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268918319337 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113837655214 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109865910936 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18318517665 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412971665538 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.