the advantages and disadvantages of working at the group! (Lecture mentions the advantages while the passage renders different ideas.
The passage provides certain advantages about being a group member and brings special reasons for each of them. On the other hand, the lecture illustrates some disadvantages of team work projects that can not be overlooked easily.
First, although the team work brings wider range of knowledge, experiences, and skills, the professor gives an example about a project that was performed at a company which was very time consuming. The group member did not have contribution and they could not reach to consensus because of different attitudes that they had. The project did not move quickly and reaching to goals was very time consuming and costly.
Second, the passage mentions that someone who works at the team can deliver their idea and be sure that their coworkers support their creativity. While, in fact, coworkers ignore each other easily without attention to the importance of the idea. This point is presented by the lecture because many project failed in the company by this reason.
Third, someone who does not like the ideas of the other member’s group never work on the idea which will eventually lead to forgetting a creative idea in the group even the idea is very special and significant.
In conclusion, working at the group has certain disadvantages that can not be ignored easily. Based on what is said at the lecture, teamwork project is very time consuming process and reaching to special approach needs lots of time. Moreover, it is more likely that some creative ideas are being ignored because of respecting to the comments of other members of group.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2014-03-21 | maryam2900 | 70 | view |
- Plan A below shows a health center in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day. Summaries the information. 78
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 72
- graph 80
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 80
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 86
The project did not move quickly and reaching to goals was very time consuming and costly.
The project which did not move quickly and reaching to goals was very time consuming and costly.
coworkers ignore each other easily without attention to the importance of the idea.
coworkers ignore each other easily without mentioning the importance of the idea.
someone who does not like the ideas of the other member’s group never work on the idea
someone who does not like the ideas of the other member’s group never works on the idea
project is very time consuming process
project is a very time consuming process
flaws:
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4
better to have 4 paragraphs:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Don't need a conclusion.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 12
No. of Words: 263 250
No. of Characters: 1284 1200
No. of Different Words: 135 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.027 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.882 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.474 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 86 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 72 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 40 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.917 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.689 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.583 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.369 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.649 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.036 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4