The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicles and CO2 emissions in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020.
The bar chart compares the amount of CO2 emission emitted by four types of vehicles while the line graph illustrates the number of vehicles. The two diagrams relate to England and Wales from 2000 to 2020.
As can be seen from the chart and graph, the bar chart shows an upward trend by varying degrees in the emission of CO2 from cars, vans, and trucks. Likewise, the line graph indicates that the number of vehicles is estimated to continue to surge.
The emission of CO2 from cars made up 20 tons, which was the highest figure in 2000. The number recorded a significant increase of about 3 tons of CO2 over a period of 10 years. Similarly, there are also an overall growth in the emission from the van and the truck from 13 tons and 15 tons in 2000 to 14 tons and 17 tons in 2010 respectively. In contrast, buses comprised the fewest emissions just 9 tons in 2000 and unchanged until 2010. By 2002, the amount of CO2 emissions from cars, vans, and trucks are expected to rise to 25 tons, 15 tons, and 23 tons respectively, whereas the data for emissions from buses will remain stable at 9 tons.
The 2000-2015 period witnessed a dramatic rise by 30 to 50 million in the number of vehicles. It is forecast that this number will increase to 55 million by 2020.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-06 | christine112 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that government money should be spent on important things rather than arts such as painting and music To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about the noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 52
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words You shou 73
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45064377682 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39624153877 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519313304721 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1604569737 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2727272727 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284823338108 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115624842379 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591190118854 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187234417869 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914614371291 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.