A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the use of others is rapidly declining.
Is it a positive or negative development?
In contemporary society, language trend has become a controversial issue in many parts of the world. It is argued that the popularity and rarity of certain languages in various countries can be considered as a positive change. Nevertheless, I do not advocate that this trend makes perfect sense for some reasons.
On the one hand, certain languages are well-advised to be offered in different places to create more job opportunities. For example, bilingual and multi-bilingual people can get a permit to become stuff easier because they can apply to several countries not only in their own hometowns but also in oversea countries. Also, the benefit can be brought to certain places whose popular languages by broadening their images. Indeed, to avoid being isolated and lagging behind others, people will try hard to be proficient at these languages by learning theory and discovering cultures.
On the other hand, I am inclined that reducing in a few languages can take a heavy toll on people whose mother languages are not popular. Firstly, this can hurt the cultural diversity because language is the most important and effective way to show off their traditions and cultures. Secondly, it can lengthen the gap between the developed levels of countries in the world and create a weakened social cohesion. To be more precise, overseas students will lag behind their friends unless they can understand the educational training written by widespread languages.
In conclusion, while the difference of using language trend can help people to get more chances to be employed and the whole countries can widen their images, I claim that its detriments outweigh its advantages for some aforementioned reasons. I suggest that people should know at least 2 languages apart from their mother tongues.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 73
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 87
- The diagram below show how leather goods are produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart and table give information about health resources and life expectancy in different countries 73
- The chart shows the information about salt intake in the US in 2000 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, apart from, at least, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22491349481 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8864063848 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584775086505 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8775606477 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.153846154 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7692307692 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1592558928 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603940676953 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480189854103 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103875139268 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221534928612 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.