The table below shows the percentage use of four different fuel types to generate electricity in five Asian countries in 2005.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table below illustrates the proportion use of four different models of fuel to make electricity in five Asian countries in 2005.
To begin with, Japan had the highest percentage of using Nuclear for generating electricity ( 49%). In contrast, Singapore had only reached 13% of using Nuclear, while, Thailand did not use Nuclear for generating electricity. Malaysia and Singapore were the leader for Coal & Ignite which contain 61% and 42%, where the remaining countries only used 3 until 6 percent. Thailand leads the leaderboard for using Petroleum products which reached 36%, but, the remaining countries have similar proportion ( 2% and 3%). South Korea and Thailand steal the spotlight again after they consumed 48% and 19% Hydro & wind to generate electricity, except for 3 remaining countries that only used little amount of this kind of fuel. Finally, from the table we can see different trends of using other fuel , for example; Thailand who reached the highest numbers of usage (42%), Singapore and Japan had the same amount of proportion ( 39%) . While Malaysia and South Korea being the lowest one because they only can get 13% and 11%
Overall, there were several trends in using different types of fuel to generate electricity in 2005
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Most people do not care enough about environmental issues To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The line charts give information about the demand for steel and the number of workers employed in a country from January to December Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- In many countries it is now illegal to smoke in public places It is only fair that people who wish to smoke should have to leave the building Do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...using Nuclear for generating electricity 49%. In contrast, Singapore had only rea...
^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...contrast, Singapore had only reached 13% of using Nuclear, while, Thailand did no...
^^
Line 3, column 500, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aining countries have similar proportion 2% and 3%. South Korea and Thailand stea...
^^
Line 3, column 789, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...see different trends of using other fuel , for example; Thailand who reached the h...
^^
Line 3, column 913, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Japan had the same amount of proportion 39% . While Malaysia and South Korea bei...
^^
Line 3, column 918, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n had the same amount of proportion 39% . While Malaysia and South Korea being th...
^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of fuel to generate electricity in 2005
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, while, except for, for example, in contrast, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16336633663 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60410086479 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579207920792 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1239477965 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.375 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26752280477 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141795030996 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125478325111 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2927797 0.15604864568 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132317986944 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.