Some people believe that the government should spend more money putting in more works of art like paintings and statues in cities to make them better places to live in.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, it can be seen that countries are investing a huge proportion of public funds in developing spectacular art statues, as many people believe that these reflect our rich historical culture resulting in boosting tourism activities. However, many others oppose this idea stating that there are numerous other hot issues that need to be addressed first. I am in discord with the given statement and think that country's economy and public needs should be prioritized above all other factors.
It is an undeniable fact that a large percentage of the country's population is under the threat of rising poverty. There are many people who are homeless and are unable to meet their basic needs. Moreover, the unemployment rate is rising dramatically causing dangerous chaos among youngsters. For example, several studies revealed that every year our youngsters either commit suicide or get engulfed in various criminal activities due to lack of job opportunities. Furthermore, the development of public school infrastructure along with technically sound healthcare systems is the need of the hour. Hence, higher authorities should channelize the majority of their funds in introducing new job opportunities and improving public properties.
On the contrary, the development of historical art paintings not only enhances country's beauty but also adds to its popularity at global levels. The people feel confident and happy seeing the adventures of art miracles. Moreover, traditional art as a whole survives as an indispensable part of society.
Also, this adds to the economy by the flourishing of the tourism industry. For instance, more visitors would choose a destination loaded with beautiful artworks.
To conclude, every year a large monetary share is dedicated to the artistic beauty of a country. The views on whether to support or disagree with this investment vary largely. Although stupendous art sculptures memorize us of our old heritage, in my personal view, the practical issues linked to public problems should be dealt with first, so that the masses can survive in a burgeoning economy.
- The graph above compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web 84
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and the present 93
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 73
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full time or part time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele 89
- The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK from 1981 to 2001 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, look, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30120481928 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78698945184 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617469879518 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1547805989 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0724766611179 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0230391974616 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0180237834127 0.0667982634062 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0433041477047 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145347540015 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.