The line graph below shows the production of paper, wood-pulp and sawn-wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph compares the amount of paper, wood-pulp and sawn-wood manufactured in the UK between 2998 and 2000.
Overall, it is notable that while there was a dramatic upward trend in the production of paper, the opposite was true for the remaining categories. Moreover, the capacity of paper produced was the highest over the period of two years.
As can be seen from the chart, starting at approximately 240 million tonnes, the amount of paper devised in the UK witnessed a significant increase of 10 million tonnes in1990 before hitting the highest point of 350 million tonnes two years later.
Looking at the chart in more detail, in 1980, a great deal of the production of wood-pulp stood at exactly 200 million tonnes as opposed to only about 130 million tonnes of sawn-wood. The next two years experienced the substantial decline to the same point of precisely 150 million tonnes in the amount of these two forest industries. From 1990 to 2000, while the figure for wood-pulp produced mounted slightly over 150 million tonnes, that for the last category decreased moderately of about 10 million tonnes,
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-16 | lynprincess03 | 64 | view |
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give 61
- The pie charts give information about world forest in five different regions 85
- Many people feel that urban environments are more unhealthy than they have ever been What do you think are the main causes of this problem What measures can be effective in tackling this problem 88
- Internet users as percentage of population
- The diagrams below show changes in Happy Valley Shopping Centre in 1982 and 2012 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 511, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d moderately of about 10 million tonnes,
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98936170213 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60649153052 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.331225401 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204854085986 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107749379482 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11392845201 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151649102967 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126230688554 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.