Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Punishment defined for the crimes and the role of adjudicating bodies in sentencing the criminals are the hot topics nowadays. Many people believe that the circumstances in which the crime is done should also be taken into account while punishing a criminal, but the others opine that the defined punishment must be indicted upon criminal for a particular crime. In my view, context of an individual crime must be considered while penalizing the wrong doers since numerous crimes take place unintentionally, due to collective failure of society or in self-defence.
There is an old tale about a king who mistakenly shot a person in a jungle while trying to prey a deer. Irrespective of the denouement of the story, I just want to depict that sometimes a very serious crime occurs unintentionally, and no sane person can punish the criminal harshly in these cases. We observe numerous such cases even today especially by law enforcement agencies (usually referred as collateral damage). Similarly, sometimes people harm someone in self-defence. For example, a person may shoot a dacoit in a botched robbery attempt. Furthermore, a gloomy reason of crimes is failure of society to serve justice. A number of criminals come from very generous families who couldn't get justice by the system and were naturally forced into criminal world. Or they were forced to do a crime by their atrocious economical conditions. Many innocent young girls are forced to step into crimes being blackmailed by their partners. In all such cases, we see our sympathies with the criminals though they actually have done crime. But keeping the circumstances into mind, a generous punishment can do far-more than a severe punishment. For example, a cop who mistakenly shot a person during a operation against drug paddlers should get less punishment than the one who choked an innocent citizen to death.
On the other hand, some people have views that the word "circumstances" is very grey and undefinable. There are no rules on which adjudicates can abate the punishment. One person may thing a crime being light, and other may think harsh on the same time. So, there should be same punishment for all criminals doing a particular crime to remove the ambiguity.
Explained both the school of thoughts, I would conclude that the punishment should be indicted based on the circumstances in which the crime took place. Otherwise a person killing a man unintentionally is incarcerated for the same time as a person who killed ten people brutally, doesn't make sense. It discourages the person with crime of less severe nature. this conception will urge people to do more harsh crimes before arrest so that their crime would be commensurate with their punishment. This thought will be very much deleterious for a peaceful society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-20 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | minhanhtran2112 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-24 | Aung | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-12 | namanpluck | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | ulzzang | view |
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime Others however argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment D 56
- University students must pay all tuition fees because it benefits mostly them individually rather than the society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 11
- Professional athletes in popular sports like football soccer and basketball are overpaid To what extent do you agree or disagree 26
- Some people argue that all experimentation on animals is bad and should be outlawed However others believe that important scientific discoveries can be made from animal experiments Can experimentation on animals be justified Are there any alternatives Giv 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ls come from very generous families who couldnt get justice by the system and were natu...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 820, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...forced to do a crime by their atrocious economical conditions. Many innocent young girls a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1195, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...cop who mistakenly shot a person during a operation against drug paddlers should ...
^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...mstances in which the crime took place. Otherwise a person killing a man unintentionally ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... person who killed ten people brutally, doesnt make sense. It discourages the person w...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 360, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...erson with crime of less severe nature. this conception will urge people to do more ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, may, similarly, so, while, for example, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2357.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 461.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11279826464 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04088827036 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520607375271 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 760.5 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8549772051 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2083333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2083333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29166666667 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 22.0 3.9879759519 552% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388097034743 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106374978702 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996155842331 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276222698251 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850918696294 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.