Mobile phones have made our lives easier: anyone can use a mobile phone to answer or make work calls or home calls at any place 7 days a week. Do you think this development has more positive effects or negative effects on the individuals and society?
With the advent of handsets, it seems to be a torture for modern citizens to live without their smartphones. While the telephones may have some undesirable effects on people’s mental well-being, I argue that the invention of this electronic devices is a positive development.
The popularity of smartphone may damage modern citizens’ interpersonal relationship, thereby posing a strain on their mental health. Since digital games and social media can be highly addicted, people may spend excessive time on their phones, instead of talking and interacting with the other. In the long term, they will be trapped in a virtual world and the relationship between friends and family will be weakened. With a healthy support system, people are more likely to experience mental disorders, such as anxiety and depression.
However, there are various reasons why the use of cellphones has more advantages than disadvantages. Firstly, telephones allow people to have easier access to information. For example, academics can gain insight to the latest development of technology and science while normal people can know more able the local news. Secondly, economic growth can be benefit from the use of telephone. Through mobile phones, business owners from different countries can communicate with each other face-to-face and they are more likely to trust each other. For this reason, global trade will increase and the economy will be flourishing. Thirdly, cellphone can strength family bonds. It is common for people to migrate to other cities and they may have less time to spend with family members. By using telephones, people can talk to their relatives in long distance and they can share each other’s daily life.
In conclusion, I accept that the use of mobile phones may damage people’s emotional well-being, but it seems to me that this trend is an overall positive development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-16 | ChanChan97 | 78 | view |
- There are social medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones What forms do they take Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phone 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of the whole world population in four countries from 1950 2002 with projections to 2050 89
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 83
- Mobile phones have made our lives easier anyone can use a mobile phone to answer or make work calls or home calls at any place 7 days a week Do you think this development has more positive effects or negative effects on the individuals and society 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of the whole world population in four countries from 1950 2002 with projections to 2050 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33444816054 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85086405634 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57525083612 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4843716542 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136908127592 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463908751681 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365754712216 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924174889783 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470344623228 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33444816054 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85086405634 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57525083612 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4843716542 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136908127592 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463908751681 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365754712216 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924174889783 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470344623228 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.