People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only.
Although a person involving in a diverse sector earns money from a wide range of sources, it would not able to as much of the person focusing on the same work. Personally, I believe that people who enrolled in the single would lead to greater progress than an array of works. I feel this way for two reasons, Which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, the current world is of specificity--and it is obvious that everyone seeks for the person having skills in the relevant field. Today, many people were found to busy in different sectors of the work although they have not ingenuity. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Recently, my house was constructed. During that majority of the construction parts required in the houses like electricity, plumbing, plastering has done by the same person. Although he has finished all works by himself, it has created a turmoil now. A few days ago, there has been a leakage of water from the pipe of the bathroom. Moreover, there is also a problem in the wiring system--one of the switches stops to work after a month of design. Had all the different parts were done by different experts, then there would not have occurred such kinds of difficulties.
Finally, those people who used to involved in the same types of regularly, they can complete there works relatively faster than others with a greater level of efficiency. They can also be sometimes referred to as a veteran, and have a less chance of error in the relevant field. For instance, when we go to the hospital, our disease would be easy and diagnosed fast if we reach to the doctors with a particular field. To be more specific, it would be difficult for a general physician to detect the internal defects of the body. Had the same case is handled by the doctors expert in relation to internal organs, patients can be diagnosed earlier, and can be treated in time,
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that people show adroitness when they get engaged in the same work. This is because they can finish the work in a shorter period of time, and because there work would be perfect.
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's rec 69
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 50
- The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict 70
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is Thus the project o 3
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs Many pterosaurs were very large some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were capabl 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 158, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e they can finish the work in a shorter period of time, and because there work would be perfec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, moreover, so, then, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64361702128 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62854236183 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5679180086 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142367183424 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391408038867 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549353745589 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792132945211 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298353426811 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.