Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples.
Today, there is an increasing trend in schools and universities to give the project as group work. Personally, I believe that students should be assessed personally. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, when working in a group, different people accomplished a part of the task differently. Some people might have greater efficiency, while others might have low. In order, to judge anyone, it would better to marks, an individual member. My personal example is a compelling example of this. When I was in university, teachers gave us a group project--the planting of the seedlings--and grade would be given on the basis of vigor examination of maximum plants. While doing so, although the majority of our group friends were too active in our work, a few are lazy. These inactive friends also got the same marks in the evaluation process. This would not be fair to the students who really work hard. Have the professor gives a unique project to each of us, those friends who are sluggish would surely fail the exam.
Finally, we can found a lot of students who have a good grade, but not a performance in the work. That is why today many governmental organizations and others have not kept in consideration the grade, which gives priority to the interview and written exam. This would only give happiness to a person for a limited period of time. For instance, again coming to my own experience, our university focuses the student on a group project for judgment. In that period, different people with altering ideas use to work together. Some are dexterous while others are obtuse. However, due to the group project, every student got the same marks/grade. As a result, those students who were weak in terms of academic, it would not be better terms of evaluation. Consequently, this happiness limits for time to an exceptional student. This is the fault of the teacher, who has made the wrong criteria for assessment.
In sum, I am of the opinion that the students should be individually judged. This is because it would be fair to the ingenious person, and students were able to perceive their actual level
- Parents today are more involved in their children s education than parents were in the past 70
- Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates, has grown into a 80
- In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books. 62
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 62
- The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ive happiness to a person for a limited period of time. For instance, again coming to my own e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...d, different people with altering ideas use to work together. Some are dexterous wh...
^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...were able to perceive their actual level
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, however, if, really, so, while, for instance, i feel, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83109919571 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76394114554 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544235924933 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.37044882 48.9658058833 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.0833333333 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5416666667 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283734035461 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776608533367 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961542718221 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161786026782 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775423904934 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.