The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph represents the count of university graduates in Canada for the time period 1992 to 2007.
It is clear from the graph that female university graduates were more than the male university graduates over the period. Both holds minimum at the start of the period and then reached to its maximum at the end of period.
It is observable from the graph that in 1992 there were only around 100,000 number of female graduates in Canada. Then this count increased gradually to almost 105,000 in the year 1995. After that it decreased to 100,000 in the year 1998. It again increased drastically to around 150,000 in the year 2007.
It can be seen that male graduates are less than female graduates in Canada. In the year 1992 there were only 70,000 male university graduates in Canada. It increased gradually to around 75,000 in 1995. After that it decreased gradually to around 70,000 in the year 1998. Finally, It increased to around 95,000 in the year 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 92 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | thucuc | 55 | view |
| 2021-09-14 | changdaynek | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | Sanaullah97 | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 56
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 Th table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main f 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79289940828 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38328622272 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 69.0 106.607317073 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.408284023669 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8168649397 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.5 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.0833333333 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.08333333333 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189485737636 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858716516565 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928459938958 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145710378237 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501029509688 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.91 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.01 8.06136585366 75% => OK
difficult_words: 18.0 40.7170731707 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.