It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children?
In general, to learn how to differentiate right from wrong, children should be taught in their early childhood. Some argue that this could be achieved by punishing them, however, I disagree with it. Is a punishment the only way for children to differ them or are there also less severe methods to apply?
It is commonly believed that punishment not only hurt feelings of youngsters, but also hinder them to learn this skill. Firstly, a punishment is forbidden in most countries due to being futile or even dangerous for children. For instance, one, who is punished to differ black and white, may have lower enthusiasm towards learning. Furthermore, when parents are applying this approach, it may seem they achieve immediate results, however, it is likely to adversely impact on their offspring in the long-term instead. Therefore, punishment cannot be applied to teach them how to learn this skill.
I believe that there are other possible solutions for teachers, not mentioned to parents to nurture children to have good behaviour. It is not uncommon to see that in many cultures, adults attempt to have individual approaches towards young generation, and hence, children are adept at differing right from wrong in their adolescent. This method may require repetitive explanations, as well as involvement several professional consultants who have significant experience to improve the skill of children, and therefore even though children learn it for years, they, no doubt, achieve it without any negative influence.
In conclusion, although some people claim that punishment is of imperative to learn certain type of skill, I believe that adults, such as teachers and parents may apply more gently methods for their children to behave which is socially acceeptable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-03 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | minhnhat230602 | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 78 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activities in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 73
- The graph shows how many people were employed in the Australian mining industry from 1900 to 1990 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The diagram shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hes towards young generation, and hence, children are adept at differing right fr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in general, no doubt, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29432624113 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83659794703 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602836879433 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2252978887 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.416666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 7.06120827912 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316682614543 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128953501887 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484938146015 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205817214623 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761404345923 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.