The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013

Essay topics:

The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013.

The table compares the five highest ranking countries in terms of the numbers of visits and the money spent by tourists over a period of two years.

It is clear that France was the world’s most popular tourist destination in the years 2012 and 2013. However, the USA earned by far the most revenue from tourism over the same period.

In 2012, 83 million tourists visited France, and the USA was the second most visited country, with
66.7 million tourists. Spain and China each received just under 58 million visitors, while Italy was ranked fifth with 46.4 million tourists. 2013 saw a rise of between 1 and 4 million tourist visits to each country, with the exception of China, which received 2 million fewer visitors than in the previous year.

Spending by tourists visiting the USA increased from $126.2 billion in 2012 to $139.6 billion in 2013, and these figures were well over twice as high as those for any other country. Spain received the second highest amounts of tourist revenue, rising from $56.3 billion to $60.4 billion, followed by France, China and Italy. Interestingly, despite falling numbers of tourists, Chinese revenue from tourism rose by $1.7 billion in 2013.

Votes
Average: 9.1 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-10-19 tieuquynh 73 view
2022-10-19 tieuquynh 89 view
2021-10-28 _nhatlinhkhongnhat_ 56 view
2021-08-17 tungxuan 84 view
2021-08-02 tortoro5454 73 view
Essays by user victory89 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 218, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...million tourist visits to each country, with the exception of China, which received 2 million fewer v...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3065992283 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6984848098 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.777777778 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116442860833 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550674683404 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406797683711 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705884631458 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373319449388 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.