The table shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013.
The table gives information about the figures for the five most developed nations for foreign visitors in two years 2012 and 2013. In general, it is evident that most of the visitors witnessed a continual increase among the four countries, whereas the opposite was true for China. In addition, tourists tended to splurge a huge amount of money on tourism in most countries, except for France.
Looking at the fact from the table, France made up the enormous number of travellers in both years, standing at nearly 85 million. This figure was also nearly twice times as high as the number of visitors from Italy. While there was a larger amount of travelers from the USA, Spain, and China with a large number at 66,7, 57,5 and 57,7 respectively. After a year, most nations saw a sharp upward trend rising to around 3 million, however, there was a slight decrease in the number of China’s tourists dropping from 57,7 to 55,7.
Turning to the tourist spending in the mentioned period, there was no double that with the drastic jump from 126,2 to 139,6 billion dollars, the USA gained the most significant profit as well as was far eclipsing the profit of other countries. France, Spain, and China spent larger money on tourism following the USA with over half a billion dollars in 2012, then increasing by 2 or 3 billion dollars in the next year. In contrast, Italy country provided the lowest returns just more than 40 billion dollars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-19 | tieuquynh | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-19 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-28 | _nhatlinhkhongnhat_ | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | tungxuan | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | tortoro5454 | 73 | view |
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995 84
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- The chart shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000 84
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Topic The chart below shows the results of three surveys on absenteeism in a particular European country in the years 2000 2005 and 2010 The results show the reasons people gave for not going to work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting th 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, then, well, whereas, while, except for, in addition, in contrast, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77911646586 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39482056986 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602409638554 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8598930003 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7 5.23603664747 223% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122306005625 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541156140598 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900961139028 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934556527913 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981884115121 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.