The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great Britain between 1961 and 2001
The line graph, representing data in percentage terms, depicts the changing trends in the proportion of people living in Great Britain who possessed one car, of residents with two or more personal automobiles as well as those who were of permanent British public transport use throughout the period of 40 years from 1961 to 2001.
As can be seen from the chart, the overall pattern could be described as a dynamical elimination of the gap between the ratio of people without any personal vehicles and those who had one or two cars starting from 1961. Moreover, there could be distinguished a similar pattern of dynamic rise in one car ownership and two-car possession, while the line showing the group of people with no car followed the graduate downward trend over the span of the presented period.
As getting into details, one can easily conclude that the trend illustrating the one car ownership was noticeably growing from approximately 35% early on and reached its all-time highs in 1981 showing that 50% of residents had their personal car with further marginal fall to above 40% in the period end. At the same time, the percentage of people with 2 or more automobiles increased by 15% in 1981 and continued to grow reaching almost 30% at the end of the period under the observation.
By contrast, the pattern of proportion of people with no car at all was reversed and undergone a rapid fall to below 35% in 1981 from 65% in the beginning with even further decline to 40 year-lows of 28% in 2001.
- The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great Britain between 1961 and 2001 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 78
- two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 84
- two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 84
- The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great Britain between 1961 and 2001 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1248.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76335877863 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67109042971 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545801526718 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 22.4926829268 191% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5094381859 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 208.0 112.824112599 184% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.6666666667 22.9334400587 190% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232932521273 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105657202051 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544590208622 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128838722886 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468199408645 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.8 13.2329268293 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.3012195122 172% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.22 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.9970731707 175% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.