It is important to ensure that children with a wide range of abilities and from a variety of social backgrounds mix with each other at school.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Does the mix of children with differentiated abilities and social backgrounds created in schools anticipate the balanced development of an individual? Some experts and parents uphold the view that letting children to learn in the mixed environment with peers of different origins is better for a kid than sending them to special schools of narrowed diversity, why others still disagree.
First of all, education process in mixed environment contributes to interactive and open-mined learning, creating personalities with deep knowledge of how the world works. Open spaces and everyday communication with a wide variety of other peers provide children with more the abilities to know how to structure the speech and oppose different viewpoints, than a closed environment does. Moreover, to deal with the fear of differences, children also adapt to be tolerant and respectful while communicating to others. Equally important, is the fact that children broaden their understanding of various cultures, languages, and peoples by learning the real life’s components in the mixing schools. For example, in the mixed environment children tend to learn more than one language and have this desire to travel all around the world.
Looking from the other perspective, some schools of mixed environment admit children that are practicing bad habits, for instance, smoking, drinking, or gambling that are not acceptable for other kids’ families. Once that behavior is met by children without unhealthy habits, the latest could be spoiled. Moreover, some advanced kids in the mixed schools could tease and bully others of medium knowledge resulting in psychological traumas and bad socialization in adulthood. And last but not least is the fact that for the students, who have an equal level of abilities, the learning process is more active and effective than for those put in the class of mixed pupils.
All in all, mixing educational spaces not only are crucial to assist children to be more creative, interactive and open-minded in learning process, but also introduce children a range of real life’s components. However, I claim that teachers in these mixed schools should be more responsible and attentive to the learning process and each kid in order to prevent bad habits development bulling in the classes.
- It is important to ensure that children with a wide range of abilities and from a variety of social backgrounds mix with each other at school To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries 84
- The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great Britain between 1961 and 2001 73
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 518, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...spectful while communicating to others. Equally important, is the fact that children br...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 367, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'habits'' or 'habit's'?
Suggestion: habits'; habit's
...ss and each kid in order to prevent bad habits development bulling in the classes.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, while, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39226519337 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93408140211 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530386740331 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.4179546391 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.153846154 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8461538462 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2636813033 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101388478657 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678773323121 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168661312784 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576405789962 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 518, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...spectful while communicating to others. Equally important, is the fact that children br...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 367, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'habits'' or 'habit's'?
Suggestion: habits'; habit's
...ss and each kid in order to prevent bad habits development bulling in the classes.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, while, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39226519337 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93408140211 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530386740331 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.4179546391 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.153846154 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8461538462 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2636813033 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101388478657 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678773323121 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168661312784 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576405789962 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.