The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting the total energy from 1971 to 2011.
The line graph compares the percentage of renewable energy consumption by different countries between 1971 and 2011.
Looking at the line graph, it is immediately apparent that there was an increase in using renewable energy in each country over the period shown. Moreover, Finland was a country that used this energy the most.
In 1971, the proportion of renewable energy using by Finland was highest, at approximately 25%. While the figures for Denmark, France, Germany, and the USA were much lower, at 15%, 8%, 5%, and 3%, respectively. On the other hand, the percentage for using renewable energy in the UK was lowest, at about 1%
Between 1976 and 1986, the percentage of using renewable energy in Finland and Denmark decreased to 16% and 10%. By contrast, the figures for the USA and the UK increasing to 7% and 3%. Meanwhile, there were no significant changes in the consumption of renewable energy in France and Germany.
By 2011, the percentage of renewable energy using by Finland had risen to 24%. The figure for Denmark had increased to 17%, compared to 14% in France, 13% in Germany, and 6% in the UK. Meanwhile, this number in the USA had dramatically increased to 17% in 2011.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-20 | Nguyen Khanh | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-05 | nquoc25 | 67 | view |
- The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas 89
- The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 70
- The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting the total energy from 1971 to 2011 67
- The table below shows the average weekly salaries of men and od women working in different occupations Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91176470588 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73650616199 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490196078431 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6509564463 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0909090909 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303037574066 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14166799649 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107686506924 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201501810919 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304241020222 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.