The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a UK city in 2010 and 2013.
The table shows figures about the total amount of household revenue as well as the average expenditure of nutrition and clothing in a UK family unit between 2010 and 2013. Meanwhile, the pie charts illustrate the percentages of financial allocation for various kinds of basic needs.
As can be seen from the table, the year 2010 reported 29000 pounds of total income, while an average UK family spent around 14000 pounds on food and clothing. In 2013, the household revenue witnessed a noticeable drop of 4000 pounds (25000 pounds). Surprisingly, the average spending on food and clothing rose to 15000 pounds.
In terms of the data in the pie charts, it is easily pointed out that an average UK family unit in 2010 spent the most on meat and fish (25%). This is followed by the fact that fruits and vegetables and clothes shared the same significance (20% and 22%). Concurrently, the spending on alternative food and drinks was also noticeably considered (18%), while dairy products provided the least significance to family units across the UK.
However, the year 2013 marked a major change in families’ expenditures. To be more specific, the spending on fruits and vegetables dramatically rose to 35%, which made it the most dominant. Moreover, both clothes and meat and fish noticed a significant drop of 10% (22% to 12% and 25% to 15% respectively). Surprisingly, UK families still allocated 18% of their income for other food and drinks. Finally, the spending on dairy products increased by 5% (20%).
A glance at the table and charts reveals that the period between 2010 and 2013 witnessed a noticeable elevation in basic needs’ spending along with a substantial rise demands for fruits and vegetables.
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a UK city in 2010 and 2013 73
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television between 1950 and 2010 84
- Task 2 Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many countries What should be done to increase cycling 78
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations 61
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 285.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99298245614 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78435147058 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 106.607317073 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9343510254 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.642857143 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346446411016 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11104811382 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078637270928 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186242017068 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588052646264 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 285.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99298245614 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78435147058 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 106.607317073 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9343510254 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.642857143 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346446411016 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11104811382 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078637270928 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186242017068 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588052646264 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.