The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003, 2006 and 2009.
The table compares how many cars manufactured in three different countries Argentina, Australia, and Thailand, in the three years 2003, 2006, and 2009.
Looking at the table, it is immediately apparent that the number of cars produced in Argentina and Thailand increased over the period shown. On the other hand, the figure for Australia decreased.
In 2003, the number of cars manufactured in Thailand was highest, at over 730 thousand. The figure for Australia was much lower, at 452.163 cars. Meanwhile, only 235.088 cars were made in Argentina during the same period.
Over the next three years, the number of cars produced in Thailand increased to over 1 million. A similar picture is evident in the figures for manufacturing cars in Argentina in 2006, which rose to 352.759. Meanwhile, the number of cards made in Australia fell to 341.268.
By 2009, the number of cars produced in Argentina had increased to 466.890. By contrast, the figure for Australia had continued to decrease to 245.624 cars. Similarly, in Thailand, the number of cars produced had slightly decreased to under 1 million.
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 67
- The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting the total energy from 1971 to 2011 67
- The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas 84
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- The table below shows the average weekly salaries of men and od women working in different occupations Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, similarly, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18888888889 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75335933985 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488888888889 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2555787652 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8333333333 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302561040993 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115574305745 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102317665286 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190935240593 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110386083287 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.23 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.