The chart below shows the percentage of the internet users in 3 countries from 1999 to 2009.
The line chart illustrates the proportion of residents using the internet in the USA, the UK, and Japan between 1999 and 2009.
It is clear that there was a sharp increase in the figure of the internet connectors in three different countries from 1999 to 2009. In particular, the UK reached the highest point of the internet users in 2009 while Japan experienced the lowest figure at the same time.
Looking at the information in more detail, in 1999, around 25% dwellers accessing the Internet in the USA, compare to about 10% in the UK and only 5% in Japan. After two years, America and the UK had an equal percentage of online users, which made up approximately 25%. In 2003, the percentage of the Internet connectors in the UK was roughly 65% which was at least four times as high as that in Japan.
As illustrated, a similar proportion of residents having access to the internet was recorded between two United nations, at 70% in 2005. Furthermore, there was a two fold increase in the figure of internet users between 2004 and 2009 in Japan (25% and 50%). In 2009, the most striking feature is that the figure for the UK's users totally dominated these from the remaining countries (100%, 90%, and 50% respectively)
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-18 | Florence1909 | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-20 | sewak.0123 | view | |
| 2021-04-20 | sewak.0123 | view | |
| 2021-03-22 | ngockhanh18112007 | 71 | view |
| 2020-10-08 | huylb314 | 73 | view |
- Some people feel schools should be responsible for providing lunch to primary and secondary students Other think parents should send their children to school with box luches made at home Analyse both positions 61
- Some people feel schools should be responsible for providing lunch to primary and secondary students Other think parents should send their children to school with box luches made at home Analyse both positions 61
- Some people feel schools should be responsible for providing lunch to primary and secondary students Other think parents should send their children to school with box luches made at home Analyse both positions 61
- The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades Although some of these changes have been negative the overall effect of this technology has been positive What are your opinions on this 80
- In prosperity our friends know us in adversity we know our friends Write an essay outline how you define friendship 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, well, while, at least, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71162790698 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60690932012 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516279069767 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 15.1836494255 43.030603864 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.555555556 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297990499688 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134292092055 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773393505497 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200210487739 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628367103307 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, well, while, at least, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71162790698 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60690932012 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516279069767 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 15.1836494255 43.030603864 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.555555556 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297990499688 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134292092055 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773393505497 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200210487739 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628367103307 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.