Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
IN recent decades, The people around the world encountered with a lot of challenge around the world such as civil war, disaster, climate change, destruction of agricultural lands and so on. These problems caused to shortage of income and lack of foods for them in their hometown. The charity is an inherent property for most of people that can not deny and some times it is beyond the recognition. I completely agree with this statement that people are more enthusiastic to help people needs their help even known ones compared to past years. I feel this wat for three reason that I want to explain my perspective as follows.
First of all, in the prosperity of technology and wealth around world from the sophisticated country to undeveloped country, people almost is more wealthy compared to past. They can meet not only rudimentary needs but also luxurious demands as blinks of eye. Moreover, they can help the other people that needs their hands without a bit lack to meet for own needs. As I remember when I was a child nearly 25 years ago my father can just satisfy his family and do not a bit extra money to give to charity but recently everything changed and We can obtain more income event some money or budget for charity.
Secondly, in recent years that widespread of media technology around the world and it is easily available from far-reaching of every corner of world. The human can inform about everything have happened around the world that needs to attention for instance civil war, disaster, refuges that needs immediate help from the world. For example, As I remember nearly five years ago when the civil wars displaced thousands of Syria people in their country and on the other hand the problem and challenges happened for them is more than to tolerate. A wide variety of charity form around the world by medical service, food, clothes, blanket, tent collected and reach to them in order they can meet their fundamental demands.
Finally, with construction of charity organization around the world founded that manage a wide variety of human crisis that needs global attention. Also, some of prestigious celebrity advocate this institution by participate in their program in destitute countries like UNICEF. This global company try to absorb the interest of people to help for underprivileged people particularly labor children that needs basic rights such as proper food and education.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in today's world have become too dependent on automobiles. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer." 66
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made reading passage adaptation of Broccoli in temperate climates with mild summers 3
- Statement of purpose Marziyeh Khavari 60
- A university recognized first year students have poor study skills in its university Some in the university believe the best way to address this is to ask all first year students have to pass course on study skills Others don t agree with this requirement 60
- frog population 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...The charity is an inherent property for most of people that can not deny and some times it is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, i feel, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2009.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96049382716 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63433069616 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520987654321 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.0012152614 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5625 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3125 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288392593893 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100849336496 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831667267282 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189540274882 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513382257638 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.