In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both view

Essay topics:

In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others, believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your opinion give reasons and include examples from personal experience ?

It is generally believed by individuals that a great amount of financial budget should be spent on building new railway tracks in cities. While, other groups argue that money should only be allocated to maintain the public transport. In my opinion, both are equally important and will discuss in the subsequent paragraphs.

On the one hand, trains that run between cities show the development of a certain area. In fact, this development has provided multiple facilities for daily workers such as commutation to workplaces and to the areas where bus services are not available. Moreover, these are considered to be the fastest mode of transportation. So, the authority should increase the network of these trains, which require a good amount of money. For example, it has been found that these trains run at a speed of 100 km/hr and require strong and durable material for their long-term stability. Thus, it makes it important to fund this growing development.

On the other hand, public transport is far cheaper than travelling in trains and making it the best mode of transportation for all sections of societies. In other words, it fits everyone's pocket, so it is mostly preferred by the local public. But, these days the condition of the government buses are very severe, therefore leading to major fatal accidents. Hence, it is a necessity to improvise the condition of these vehicles, in order to provide safe travel to every individual.

In conclusion, after analysing both the points in detail, it is crystal clear that both the situations have their own importance towards mankind and the government should provide equal amounts of funds for these necessary developments.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-07 Vivi_peach 67 view
2023-01-18 Behnaz.babayani 73 view
2021-11-23 mina_sharifi 84 view
2021-07-16 aaaudrey43 78 view
2020-10-11 S.Ranaut 78 view
Essays by user S.Ranaut :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... building new railway tracks in cities. While, other groups argue that money should o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t paragraphs. On the one hand, trains that run between cities show the develop...
^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us services are not available. Moreover, these are considered to be the fastest m...
^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... than travelling in trains and making it the best mode of transportation for all ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14909090909 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83224409463 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610909090909 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1148778643 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.142857143 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242680312069 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072873038103 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591072905096 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140666457752 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688272713665 0.056905535591 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.