The process shows the design of modern landfill for household waste.
The diagram illustrates the draw of modern landfill which contain household waste and describe how to use it.
Overall, there are three main steps, beginning with building a hole and finishing with closing if it was full of trash.
First, people make a large hole from natural rock before install some stuffs in it. There are synthetic linings and clay columns in both inner sides. Furthermore, people give a drainage roller on the drainage tank at the bottom of the hole. Therefore, the complete man-made landfill is done.
The next step, when people use it, all household waste are pulled out of the truck which is parked near the waste hole. At that time, waste liquid run into the gap of the roller and is absorbed underground. The other substances of waste are keep on the roller until the amount of waste are full. This lead to the final step meaning closure. People use the clay to cover the waste hole and set a pipe which next to the clay to translate gases out.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on the roller until the amount of waste are full. This lead to the final step me...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53551912568 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19255783571 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590163934426 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6810765893 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.4545454545 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166345773432 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634661294097 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765432863851 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104879315229 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991527983146 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.