The chart below shows the numbers of incidents and injuries per 100
million passenger miles traveled (PMT) by transportation type in
2002.
The given bar chart compares the report on the number of people(per 100 million PMT) who either encountered an incident or underwent injuries by five different transportation types in the year 2002.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the number was highest in both the scenarios in the context of demand response, while the least was witnessed from the commuter rail. However, incidents outweigh the injuries over the given period.
According to the given illustration, nearly 225 million of the incidents were reported under the demand response as compared to the others that remained below 100 million. Also, whilst the bus incidents reached on par with the light rail, at 76 million, the incidents from the commuter rail came out to be lower than half as reported by the heavy rail, at 51 million.
In contrast, out of the total injuries, about 173 million fell under the demand response category, which was more than double the bus injuries(66 million). Besides, with just a marginal difference, injuries from the light and heavy rail were nearly the same(35 and 39 million). However, the commuter rail observed the least injuries, only 3 million fewer than the number of incidents.
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 77
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 11
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 84
- The charts below show the main reasons for the study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 89
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and the present 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, look, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58988416729 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7138897974 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.25 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256112492572 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118737948544 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981505014649 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173224608798 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110861263458 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.