People learn things better from those at their own level—such as fellow students or co-workers—than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors.
Undoubtedly, it is fact that teachers are the ideal people from whom we can learn things much better as compared to others. However, I agree with the statement that we can learn better from our fellow friends, students or co-workers because of following three reasons.
First of all, as our friends or co-workers are at same stage, they all are also going through some phase as us. Thus, they might know an effective technique by which they learn things. For example, if I am facing difficulty in solving physics problems then I can easily contact my friends to help as they might know a way to solve these problems. From this, in turn friends can also learn new things and they could also improve.
Secondly, the fellow students or co-workers are of almost same age and it is more likely that they have same thinking or thought process as ours. For instance, if we are working on some project and we are unable to make any progress, then co-workers could provide some idea in the way we are familiar with.
Finally, higher level people such as teachers might not be able to always help as they may not know what exactly we are going through. In addition, the teachers are already burdened with doubts from other students and they may not have enough time such that they can explain in a way we can digest. For instance, consider a class of 100 students, where a professor is teaching advanced mathematics. Now, many students might ask doubts and the professor may not answer in a way we can understand, whereas if you ask our friends sitting next to us, then they might be able to explain in proper way.
In conclusion, people learn more and better from friends than from teachers, who are at a higher-level due to the above three reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-20 | Alana Gerber | 88 | view |
| 2022-12-29 | villian7 | 68 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | rpinisetti8 | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | Tanvayee15 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | Louissun | 70 | view |
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 70
- The world’s forests are facing increasing pressure which, if left unchecked, will threaten the health of many industries, economies, nations, and lives. The development of an international fund to help developing countries implement useful conservation 60
- Claim Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive Reason It is primarily in cities that a nation s cultural traditions are preserved and generated Write a response in which you discuss the ext 62
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 52
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ee with the statement that we can learn better from our fellow friends, students or co...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64308681672 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39606588155 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508038585209 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8992590378 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.076923077 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2307692308 5.45110844103 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257093198612 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103225603346 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943514986716 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173813436904 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103056017276 0.0645574589148 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 86.8835125448 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.