Essay topics Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

In history, humans always have looked forward to having a good job that satisfies them and gives them good money. However, the economic and social situations have changed and affected the job conditions. The controversial question that comes up here is whether, in the past, it was easier to identify what type of job would lead to a secure and bright future. Today, I firmly contend that it would be difficult to distinguish a career with a successful and promising future. In what follows, I will elaborate on my viewpoint.

First, everyday science will develop because scientists are making a breakthrough. They are working on some projects that people have never thought about it. Suddenly people notice that scientists have found something relevant to their jobs. Sometimes these discoveries come up to make their jobs easier. However, sometimes these discoveries cause them to lose their jobs. For example, I read in magazines that scientists are working on building robots by using artificial intelligence to replace humans. This development will jeopardize many jobs. Even they want to use medical robots instead of doctors. So, according to these scientific endeavours, it would be a little complicated to find out what will happen in the future.

Second, on one side, the knowledge and awareness of people have increased, so they value being educated and specialists. On the other side, people can access educational facilities easily. As a result, today, not only many people are educated, but also experts in their fields. So, the competition between those who are looking for an ideal and secure job has increased. Furthermore, even if you find a job, but if you don’t do it well, they can fire you and replace you with someone more expert. I remember one of my friends worked in a company. In this company, the only important thing was that you accomplish your project quickly. In this way, the company can do more projects that can benefit it more. But my friend’s father had got sick. Finally, they fired my friend for taking along time to finish his projects.
To wrap it up, today, having a dream job depends on a lot of factors that are out of our control and make having a hopeful future uncertain.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-25 Zmx_6 73 view
2023-06-25 Zmx_6 73 view
2023-03-29 waliwaliwa 73 view
2023-03-29 waliwaliwa 73 view
2023-03-29 waliwaliwa 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user zahragoli.995 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 786, Rule ID: ALONG_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'a long time'?
Suggestion: a long time
...inally, they fired my friend for taking along time to finish his projects. To wrap it up,...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, well, for example, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95733333333 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67112959875 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570666666667 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5264967924 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.36 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177995050496 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420601058394 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635578537162 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102875054554 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697727712193 0.0645574589148 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.